Word Reappropriation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Word Reappropriation - Assignment ExampleIt was just an innocent word that conveyed just that meaning of something odd or unusual. This was the public meaning for the word until about a century ago. But queer began to be the disparagement for homosexuals and lesbians since then (Irvine, Martha).How do some words and nouns change meaning They say, it is all in the mind. The mind is the source of all things, good and awful. You accept what is good and leave aside the things that are not so nice. However, socio-political or socio-economical built in bed does not pay homage to such noble acceptances or rejections. These words become outright evil in the minds of people and they are so case-hardened with abomination and hatred that it becomes another synonym for the devil himself. Otherwise, why would they generate caution and circumspection to such an extent that their usage begins to draw ire and consequencesFor example, the mark REDSKINS and REDSKINETTES as applied to football en tertainment services, and MOONIES as applied to a doll that exposes its buttocks, have been criticized as disparaging Native Americans and religious followers of the wedlock Church, respectively. But in each of these examples, the applicant seeking trademark protection was not a member of the disparaged crowd rather, the applicant was a nonmember, attaching a historic slur to a product targeted toward the general public (Anten, Todd).Hence, as a rule of thumb, it is generally accepted that when a word associated disparagingly with a group is put forward for something serious like legal clearance for registration, such words are counted as being derisive of a group, it may be any group, and these words have to be expunged. But the question arises. Why must these words be expunged What is wrong in them They are not bad words. These words express a meaning. They may sound derisive to some. But they are understood to protest for something that may be noble. They need not stand for th e gospel truth when they are mistook for something that may differ from their original meaning.We all know what is bitch. The word has evolved to an extent that is exists in an out-of-shape form. I readily visualize that a bitch is an odious woman. Yes, that is bitch It is that woman I do not care about. She is a bitch You tell her anything she will believe. She is a foetid woman So she is a bitch. Unacceptable as this word has become, it is bandied about in all hue and shape with chivalrous regularity. The word may be synonymous with infamy. But its reach has scaled dizzying levels. One may not feel overwhelmed or ashamed when it is associated with none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton (Zeisler, Andi).This sounds hilarious as tumefy as hegemonic. The same group that is using a word for an international figure has also discarded the original meaning for bitch. Call it a she-dog. Do not call her a bitch. The bite in the word bitch has turned so nasty that it has assassinated its original owner.Word embezzlementWord re-appropriation goes hand in hand with word misappropriation. Not that it is intended to be misappropriated. But the process of gradual re-appropriation has